MyOpinion: October 2019

Purpose

We do not easily envision a Sustainable World. What defines a Sustainable World that you would like to live in, that would satisfy your deepest dreams and longings? Does that vision include a diversity of people without injustice or inequality?

Utilizing System Dynamics Methodology (level and flow language), this paper describes sustainable governance in order to improve our understanding and gain insight into the dynamics of a way to implement changes in global systems of government, economics and ecology.

Key Concepts

Population, resources and pollution are the primary accumulations (levels) to focus on, in order to understand growth. Growth in population requires a surplus of resources. As an increasing number of people demand a higher standard of living, this also requires productivity improvements in the use of resources.

As land, water and air are consumed or removed from the commons, there is less available for others. As pollution is added to the land, water and atmosphere, the remaining common resources are not good enough for future generations to use.

The Lockean Proviso supports the privatization of the commons and must remain true for the continued justification of private property rights by individuals and corporations. The Lockean Proviso was devised as the criterion to determine what makes property acquisition just. When the Lockean Proviso is not true then private property acquisition is unjust to others.

Problem Statement

The Lockean Proviso is true when there is enough left in common for others and the quality is good enough so that others are not deprived of the use of the common resource. An unsustainable world is when the quality of the commons is depleted so that others are deprived of resources.

Criticism of Sustainable Development

Criticism of United Nations actions to encourage sustainable development reveal a traditional approach. Conservatives and Republican politicians claim the UN has a plan to stealthily impose world-wide centralized control over people, attacking private property and energy usage. Also, claiming the UN Agenda 21 (1) is “...a comprehensive plan of extreme environmentalism, social engineering, and global political control.”

In a review of Systems of Survival, Peter J. Boettke refers to words by Ludwig von Mises countering an argument put forth by Otto Bauer: "....rationalizing production is impossible. Without private ownership, economic planners will not be able to rationally calculate the best use of scarce capital resources." Again, referring to Mises: "...we have at our disposal only two ways to acquire resources—we can either voluntarily trade or we forcefully take."

Guardian versus Commercial Systems

There are two ways to make a living in the 21st Century. You either work for a Guardian or a Commercial organization. Lawyers are the only profession that can have their work involved in both systems.

Governments protect commerce, provide stability, administer justice, and enforce uniform standards. Commerce provides the economic engine and the ethical framework for trade, technological advance, and individual rights that combine to make governments worth living under. Yet these two ethical systems are mutually exclusive and cannot be rashly integrated without the risk of ethical confusion caused by a conflict of interest.

Without a proper Guardian infrastructure the Commercial system could be threatened. The laws enforced by the Guardian system to manage property rights benefit the Commercial system. But the Guardian also knows fundamental wealth includes natural resources, and supports the idea that social justice includes fair distribution. Ample room for improvement exists if Guardians lay down the policies, remain serious about enforcing them, and keep their own hands off ways and means of complying.

The systems of interest are the two human systems (Guardian and Commercial) and their duties and obligations towards a Sustainable World and the Common Good, and the required positive contribution of their activities to this goal (as part of a renewed Social Contract). A Sustainable World will only function within the symbiotic relationship of the Guardian and Commercial systems.

Goal

In a Sustainable World shall decreasing poverty remain the primary goal? This graph (http://tinyurl.com/73jtkft) from the World Bank shows that extreme poverty has been decreasing over time since 1980. Over that same time period, except for Sub-Saharan Africa AIDs epidemic, life expectancy has continued to increase. So, a Sustainable World does not need a primary goal to decrease poverty.

In a Sustainable World, shall increasing profits and accumulating wealth remain the market’s primary goal? The primary goal of the Commercial system includes them. However a Sustainable World includes a balancing feedback loop that allows the Commercial system to function as intended and at the same time the Lockean Proviso remains true.

Shall a Sustainable World include centralized control, global political control or social engineering? A Sustainable World does have consequences for private property and energy usage when the depletion of resources and pollution of the commons continue at current levels resulting in the Lockean Proviso not remaining true. For example, a tipping point happened when privatization of fossil fuels polluted land, water and air so that others were deprived of their use of clean land, clean water and clean air, resulting in the Lockean Proviso not being true. Therefore the use of fossil fuels became unjust at that point in time.

Therefore, the goal of a Sustainable World is for the Lockean Proviso to always remain true in the symbiotic relationship between the Guardian and Commercial systems.

Reference Behavior Pattern

In System Dynamics, a Reference Behavior Pattern (RBP) is the observed or anticipated behavior of the real system. The RBP uses a qualitative diagram of the system consequences so that when a computer model graphs results from a simulation, the results can be compared to the RBP for validation and verification. Also, the RBP are the consequences of the system defined by the goal and so the RBP must be aligned with the goal of the system.

The RBP of a Sustainable World would show decreasing depletion of resources from the Commons and decreasing pollution of the Commons.

Boundaries

The whole earth is inside the boundaries of the Sustainable World including all the land, water and air. However, our system model is going to focus on the interaction between human organizations and the Commons. First, the system model will be a general description to start with a model that works. Then over time, the model will become more detailed, more focused and specific.

Diagram

At the highest level a diagram of the Sustainable World includes three systems: Guardian, Commercial and Commons. First the Guardian and Commercial systems are linked in a symbiotic relationship as described earlier. Second, the Commercial system is linked to the Commons to privatize resources from the Commons and the Guardian system is linked to the Commons to protect resources by removing them from those available to be privatized. For now, these are just lines connecting bubbles. In a computer model the levels, flows and parameters will be separated out and linked together.

Waste from the Commercial system is returned to the Commons. The Guardian system uses laws, rules and regulations to control the privatization of resources from the Commons and the flow of wastes to the Commons. Regulation of the resources and waste flows are marked with a red “R” in the diagram above.

This diagram represents accumulations and flows in an unclear way like a causal loop diagram. The diagram is aligned with the goal of the Sustainable World by having the Guardian system regulate the flows to and from the Commons so that the Lockean Proviso is true. However there are several problems. First, wastes that go back to the Commons must keep the Commons good enough for others to use. Second, the diagram does not show the recycling flows of privatized resources and wastes within the Commercial system. Third, this is too high a level of diagram to convert into a computer model. Finally, there is insufficient detail in order to create a policy that would not cause unintended results.

Here is the first draft of a Sustainable World Model of resources flowing between the Commons, private property and protected property developed using Insight Maker.